Accueil
http://www.la-articles.org.uk/FL-7-1-3.pdf
"Hume was a hard determinist and Locke a soft determinist, but despite this divergence, neither of them held the slightest belief in metaphysical free will." (p.3)
"Perhaps fusionism can be defended, but it cannot be sustained by the central argument that Meyer used to buttress In Defence of Freedom, for that argument rests upon an inadvertent application of the fallacy of equivocation." (p.4)
-Patrick M. O'Neil, "The Failure Of Fusionism In The Libertarian - Traditionalist Debate. Frank Meyer's Equivocation Of The Two Freedoms", The Journal of the Libertarian Alliance, Vol. 7 : No.1.
"Hume was a hard determinist and Locke a soft determinist, but despite this divergence, neither of them held the slightest belief in metaphysical free will." (p.3)
"Perhaps fusionism can be defended, but it cannot be sustained by the central argument that Meyer used to buttress In Defence of Freedom, for that argument rests upon an inadvertent application of the fallacy of equivocation." (p.4)
-Patrick M. O'Neil, "The Failure Of Fusionism In The Libertarian - Traditionalist Debate. Frank Meyer's Equivocation Of The Two Freedoms", The Journal of the Libertarian Alliance, Vol. 7 : No.1.
