Accueil
http://www.sulloway.org/PoliticalConservatism(2003).pdf
"For more than halfacentury, psychologists have been tracking the hypothesisthat different psychologicalmotives and tendencies underlie ideological differences between the political left and the right. […]
In addition to classic and contemporary approaches to authoritarianism, we cover less obvious sources of theory and research on individual differences associated with dogmatism and intolerance of ambiguity, uncertainty avoidance, need for cognitive closure, and social dominance orientation (SDO) insofar as each of these psychological variables contributes to a deeper and more nuanced understanding of political conservatism." (p.339)
-John T. Jost, Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski & Frank J. Sulloway, "Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition", Psychological Bulletin, 2003, Vol. 129, No. 3, 339—375.
"For more than halfacentury, psychologists have been tracking the hypothesisthat different psychologicalmotives and tendencies underlie ideological differences between the political left and the right. […]
In addition to classic and contemporary approaches to authoritarianism, we cover less obvious sources of theory and research on individual differences associated with dogmatism and intolerance of ambiguity, uncertainty avoidance, need for cognitive closure, and social dominance orientation (SDO) insofar as each of these psychological variables contributes to a deeper and more nuanced understanding of political conservatism." (p.339)
-John T. Jost, Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski & Frank J. Sulloway, "Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition", Psychological Bulletin, 2003, Vol. 129, No. 3, 339—375.
